Unpious — an archiveVoices on the Hasidic Fringe · 2010–2014
search all archives
Home › 2010 › January

Connected

By Shulem Deen · January 17, 2010 · Off the Derech


Restfulness and joy; light unto the Jewish nation.

At first glance it might seem like the Shabbos table of any Chasidic home. The candles are lit. At the edge of the table lies a colored parsha page from a pre-school child and a list of farher questions for the seven-year-old. The smell of steaming cholent wafts in from the kitchen. But some things are off. There’s only one chalah under the blue and gold embroidered chalah cover; the host doesn’t bother with lechem mishnah. And someone’s phone rings.

“Can you put your phone on vibrate?” The hostess says softly. “My son is in the other room.” Her elegant sheitel gives her an air of regency.

Soon the son makes an appearance, a smiling, slightly shy, boy of nine. He seems to recognize the faces around the table, but he knows it’s an unusual group. Three Chasidim with shtreimlech (or at least could potentially be wearing them; they’re mostly abandoned somewhere on a kitchen table or an unoccupied La-Z-Boy), two former Chasidim whose background can only be detected by their slight accents, two Chasidish women – our hostess, and a young mother who changed into a short skirt and sleeveless top before driving over – and three non-Jewish women, our shiksa goddesses.

Someone makes Kiddush. Some do the ritual washing at the kitchen sink – for the children’s sake – but most don’t bother. The meal consists of traditional Shabbos food. But the meal itself is over rather quickly and the children are put to bed.

Other guests come by. Chasidim, former Chasidim, and non-Jewish friends. The banter flows, a mixture of English and Yiddish, and even the non-Jewish guests, who seem confounded at times, get the gist of it. Intellectual discussions overlap arguments of Jewish law and mix freely with Chasidic gossip: Was Bertrand Russel too rational? And if logical positivists were really consistent about us being a mere set of molecules with no innate specialness then I can kick you in the butt, and don’t take it personally. Someone frowns and says that’s too simplistic. Another mentions Voltaire, and yet another counters that he was just a cynical jackass—this particular Chasid despises him for his attacks on Rousseau, his favorite persona from the Republic of Letters. Did you hear of so-and-so who is sleeping with so-and-so? Yes, both from Willi, but one is originally from KJ. And an argument ensues about the exact conditions for a contemporary rabbi to forbid the woman from continuing to live with her husband.

The red wine flows freely, and the environment is relaxed, joyful, infused with the warmth of genuine Chasidic camaraderie. Someone starts a Belzer niggun, and all who know it join in and the others hum along. Another song and another song, and soon all are standing, hands clasped to shoulders, swaying energetically to the rhythm of Carlebach’s Atoh Sokum. The energy rises with the chorus as Chasidim and non-Chasidim alike sing as with one voice, Ki va moed… Ki va moed… For the time has come.

We head to an abandoned staircase out back for a smoke, careful not to raise the suspicion of neighbors; the ramifications could be devastating. But it’s a risk the host is willing to take, for the sake of this once-a-week escape from the agonies of a double life lived for the children’s sake, knowing all too well that once they’re ensconced in the cocoon of the Chasidic world they cannot be easily removed without serious psychological upheaval.

“This is totally bizarre!” one of our non-Jewish friends says. “You guys don’t believe in any of this, live totally secular lives, yet you are attracted to this culture like moths to a fire.” She refers especially to those who’ve left, who would appear to an outsider as having no special connection to this ultra-religious and confining lifestyle.

We try to explain. We’ve left this world in one sense. But in another sense we’re still as attached as ever. She thinks she understands, but she shakes her head. It boggles the mind. She’s slightly overwhelmed by all the Yiddish and the Chasid-talk and the strange songs and the aspects of this unfamiliar culture that have both an overwhelming air of foreignness yet is vaguely appealing. She admires the openness, the generosity, the ease with which we accept strangers in our midst.

We head back and sing Shifchi kamayim libeich. And segue into a top-40 pop song; finally the goyim feel somewhat at home. Many hours have passed, and dawn is nearing. Someone brings out a bowl of cholent and a plate of kishke, and it’s devoured with relish. One of the non-Jewish women claims she loves it—she’s probably just being very polite, some of us tell her, but no, she claims she’s sincere. She must have a Jewish soul, the hostess tells her, obviously pleased. A goy eating cholent is like a Chasid eating lobster; it just doesn’t seem natural. But there’s nothing natural about what we’re doing here. The incongruities are so many that normalcy would’ve been an oddity. But only one oddity more among so many.

Tags: camaraderie, cholent, kishke, non-Jews, shabbos, songs
Recovered from the Wayback Machine (copy of 2011-09-11). Original page in the Wayback Machine.

25 Responses

Yonah · January 17, 2010 at 6:00 pm

As I said, is Chasidus today anything more than a culture?

Reading this made the sentimental fool inside of me smile bitterly.

Hasidic Rebel · January 17, 2010 at 6:14 pm

Yonah, it’s not entirely true that Chasidus is no more than an culture, if by “no more” you mean there are no dogmas and doctrines central to the lifestyle. There certainly are.

But indeed, it can be argued that the true distinctions between Chasidim and other Charedi groups are rather trivial, pertaining more to a general worldview or zeitgeist than philosophical or theological principles.

Shiksa Goddess #3 · January 17, 2010 at 7:20 pm

Where was I during the Bertrand Russell discussion? And the free-flowing red wine?? :-)

-a

Hasidic Rebel · January 17, 2010 at 7:24 pm

Shiksa — You were out gossiping in the hallway just then. ;)

Lily · January 17, 2010 at 7:43 pm

Great post, Hasidic Rebel. I can relate to and appreciate the sentiment of being drawn to and repulsed by the frum lifestyle. It’s a bizarre dichotomy, but in a way, a comforting one. Keep up the great work on the site – it’s wonderful!

Isaac, translate this! · January 17, 2010 at 8:44 pm

Isaac likes, but do you need to use the “s” word?

Hasidic Rebel · January 17, 2010 at 8:46 pm

Isaac, those S’s love the S word. Or so they say. Who am I to argue?

JRS · January 17, 2010 at 9:02 pm

Eloquent.
A respectful question:
“for the children’s sake…”
What I don’t get is—as someone who appears to value intellectual curiosity & ambition, objectivity and engagement with the wonders of the world around us—doesn’t a proud, loving father, deep down, want his kids to have the same qualities and opportunities? Or, perhaps more to the point, why would said father want his kids to grow up with the same straitjacket, however comforting it might be to those who know nothing else? Warm, fuzzy, admittedly emotional ties to our lifestyle notwithstanding—why would he want his kids to be raised behind the same veil, the one that now causes such conflict or at least, inconsistency, in his own life?
I ask this not critically, but as one who wrestles with this issue, albeit in the abstract (at this time).

Shtreimel · January 17, 2010 at 9:03 pm

Where was I during the gossiping?

Yonah · January 17, 2010 at 9:08 pm

Out smoking.

Shiksa Goddess #3 · January 17, 2010 at 9:13 pm

Isaac, we take the s-word as a term of endearment in this circle. It has nothing but the warmest of connotations.

JRS,
Are you forgetting the repercussions of removing a child from the world he already knows so well, especially one so insular? I completely understand where you are coming from in believing that a father would want the same opportunity for his children that he has begun to seek out (for whatever reasons), but isn’t it a little more complicated than that? Shouldn’t the children be eventually allowed to decide whether they want to exist behind the same “veil” for themselves at a later (less formative and vulnerable) stage in their lives?

I think that part of being a proud, loving father in this context is understanding that you have brought children into this world and the lifestyle they have been born into may present them with restrictions and ideologies you no longer agree with. A Catch 22 indeed, however I think one of the options is considerably less damaging in the long run.

Streimel,
Probably gossiping with Shiksa #2 over an alcoholic beverage of some sort. We’ll get some quality time in next week. :-)

Shtreimel · January 17, 2010 at 9:22 pm

How would you know anyway. :)

Shtreimel · January 17, 2010 at 9:24 pm

This is giving me a headache. Where was Shiksa #1 then?

Shiksa Goddess #3 · January 17, 2010 at 9:36 pm

Streimel dearest,

The headache might be from spending so much time in the smoky hallway. Simple deduction can solve this mystery!

Thus…
If I was in the hallway gossiping and Shiksa #2 was gossiping with you in the dining room that leaves no other option but Shiksa #1, in the ballroom, with the candlestick!

(10 points to the chasidim who gets the reference!)

Shiksa Goddess #3 · January 17, 2010 at 9:43 pm

However, to defend Isaac and quote the great Wikipedia…

“The word shiksa is etymologically partly derived from the Hebrew term sheketz, which means “abomination”, “impure,” or “object of loathing”, depending on the translator.”

And there’s my Yiddish lesson for the day!

Shtreimel · January 17, 2010 at 9:55 pm

Etymology aside, the meaning has only positive connotations nowadays. Especially when accompanied by “goddess”.

Hasidic Rebel · January 17, 2010 at 10:14 pm

Shiksa: Not even a challenge; the chasidim will run to the oracles of Google and Wikipedia.

But it just so happens I have children of board-game-playing age, and Clue was one of their favorites (and my worst!). ;)

Hasidic Rebel · January 17, 2010 at 10:40 pm

JRS: As SG#3 put it so well, it’s much more complicated than that. “Why would a father want that?” Well, he ain’t got much of a choice. It would be like taking a kid in Africa who’s never learned to read and write and place him in Harvard for the “wonderful opportunities.”

Opportunities and possibilities don’t exist in a vacuum. There’s a lot of cultural context within which they come about, and children raised in a Chasidic environment would need to adapt in a way that might be almost impossible.

Now, if you were speaking of parents that both agreed on the issue AND they came to those conclusions when their children were relatively young, you might have an argument. But think of the father who comes to certain conclusions with which his wife disagrees — or vice versa — AND he has children who’ve been raised within the Chasidic culture for years (think 10-12 year olds), those “opportunities” might be well nigh impossible, despite a parent’s best intentions.

It’s very difficult to describe to an outsider what a closed world the Chasidic community is. Even adults have serious challenges when they decide to leave it. For children it can be positively traumatic.

Velveteen Rabbi · January 18, 2010 at 9:35 am

A wonderful essay, HR; thank you for posting it. You bring the scene so beautifully to life.

Jews and goyim singing niggunim and top-40 hits together, talking about community matters and worldly things, drinking wine and celebrating until late into the night: could be one of my Jewish Renewal community’s Shabbos gatherings! :-)

Chaim Chusid · January 18, 2010 at 3:40 pm

Hi!

I do like what you’ve written very much! You can actually feel that light-hearted spirit flow from the words.

The scene your pen paints is seen quite often these days, both the host and the guest roles are being played out quite frequently as of late, at least in my neighborhood.

I do wonder though,, in the end,, who is the host and who is the guest?

I remain,
Chaim

emily · January 18, 2010 at 8:02 pm

i absolutely love that in some ways you are able to combine the best of both worlds. i wonder how long it took before you (and the guests) were able to achieve what seems like a relatively happy medium–without feeling any residual resentment towards the whole lifestyle?
keep up the great posts.

Transitional Perspective · January 19, 2010 at 1:21 am

A “shood” i couldn’t be there. i was in connecticut for shabbos.

e · January 23, 2010 at 10:42 pm

nice post.

Marc Kay · February 3, 2010 at 4:13 am

sounds like fun, hopefuly i can make it there 1 of these weekends.

i love me some shiksahs, but chassidic men still rule. (why do u think the shiksahs r coming by? to get with the hot ortho looking men)

Shiksa Goddess #3 · February 12, 2010 at 9:47 am

We come for the cholent.

← Chasidus 2.0  |  News Roundup – Monday, 1/18 →